King v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]e agree with [the military servicemember] that his military pension may not be considered directly or indirectly in the distribution of the marital property.\ (quotation marks omitted)
• “[W]e agree with [the military servicemember] that his military pension may not be considered directly or indirectly in the distribution of the marital property.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lambert v. Lambert
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-07-31· cited 37×
• Davis v. Davis
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1989-09-28· cited 37×
• Brinkley v. Brinkley
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-10-06· cited 35×
• Youngbluth v. Youngbluth
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-05-28· cited 33×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCarty v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
• Charlton v. Charlton
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-07-08· cited 37×
• Grotelueschen v. Grotelueschen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-18· cited 21×
• Kendall v. Kendall
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-05-06· cited 18×
• Darwish v. Darwish
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-10-22· cited 12×
• Bywater v. Bywater
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-08-31· cited 10×
• Philip Olender & Co. v. Quality House Bakery, Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-07-26· cited 3×