Skip to main content
· 7/15/1988

King v. Kayak Manufacturing Corp.

Citations

  • 688 F. Supp. 227
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7402
  • 1988 WL 75069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Authority exists to support the Court’s conclusion that a written order is not necessarily a paramount consideration in determining whether a case is ripe for removal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maxwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.