Skip to main content

Turcotte v. Fell

Citations

  • 68 N.Y.2d 432
  • 502 N.E.2d 964
  • 510 N.Y.S.2d 49
  • 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that since passage of comparative negligence statute, assumption of risk is now subsumed in question whether defendant owed plaintiff duty of care
  • concluding that a \reckless or intentional\ standard applied in a case involving a professional jockey injured during a horse race
  • finding that the defendant owed “no more than a duty to avoid reckless or intentionally harmful conduct”
  • applying the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk to horse racing despite a municipal regulation prohibiting \foul riding\
  • discussing express assumption of risk, primary assumption of risk, secondary assumption of risk, consent and waiver
  • “... the dismissal of the complaint against Fell, [the defendant’s] employee, mandates dismissal of the complaint against the employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

502 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Turcotte v. Fell

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.