King Ocean Cent. Am. v. Precision Cutting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an ocean carri- er’s liability was not contemplated or covered under the Car- 1272 REGAL-BELOIT v. KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA mack Amendment”
• holding that “an ocean carrier’s liability was not contemplated or covered under the Carmack Amendment”
• holding that “an ocean carrier’s liability was not contemplated or covered under 15 the Carmack Amendment”
• discussing the legal history of through bills of lading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).