Ivana Vidovic Mlinar v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the asserted errors [were not] preserved at trial” and, thus, “giv[ing] the defendant the benefit of a more lenient standard”
• not ineffective to decline to file motion that would not have materially aided defense
• counsel's strategic decision on focus of cross-examination was not \manifestly unreasonable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).