Kindred v. Human Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an employee must “prove that [his qualifications were so superior and] so obvious that [the employer’s] reasoning was unbelievable and must be construed as merely a pretext for age discrimination”
• stating that an employee must \prove that *** [his qualifications were so superior and] so obvious that *** [the employer's] reasoning was unbelievable and must be construed as merely a pretext for age discrimination\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clyde v. Human Rights Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-20· cited 15×
• Illinois J. Livingston Co. v. Human Rights Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-04· cited 10×
• Vidal v. ILL. HUMAN RIGHTS COM'N
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-27· cited 6×
• J. Livingston Co. v. Human Rights Comm'n
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roderick LA MONTAGNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN CONVENIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-12-27· cited 347×
• Freeding-Skokie Roll-Off Service, Inc. v. Hamilton
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 49×
• Lundberg v. Church Farm, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-31· cited 49×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Short
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-06-22· cited 30×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-05-27· cited 17×
• In Re Estate of Weir
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-12-14· cited 14×