Kim v. Citigroup, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “CAP stock was compensation and, therefore, governed by the Wage Act based upon the plain language of the election agreement”
• holding that a similar wage statute is not violated when an employee voluntarily invests wages in a stock plan with a vesting period and voluntarily forfeits the unvested portion of the stock
• holding that a similar wage statute is not violated when an employee voluntarily invests wages in a stock plan with a vesting period and voluntarily forfeits the unvested portion of the stock
• finding that the state wage act was not violated
• “The retained amounts included approximately $18,386 of earned wages which had been paid to Kim in the form of the CAP stock.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).