Khrul v. Foremans Cleaners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• medical arbiter’s report stating that the claimant’s current symptoms were likely caused by the stress of the ongoing claim permitted inference that part of the claimant’s impairment was due to the compensable condition or the stress of claims processing
• so holding with respect to OAR 436-035-0007(5)’s similarly worded predecessor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hicks v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-10· cited 9×
• Hicks v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-25· cited 8×
• Coleman v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-28· cited 7×
• Walker v. Providence Health System Oregon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-19· cited 4×
• Suhor Industries, Inc. v. Pickett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-08
• Gage v. Fred Meyer Stores - Kroger Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-06

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• SAIF Corp. v. Danboise
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-04-23· cited 7×