Hicks v. SAIF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the arbiter report was unambiguous where the arbiter twice reported that the claimant’s impairment was “100 percent” due to his accepted condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hicks v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-10· cited 9×
• Saif Corp. v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 9×
• SAIF Corp. v. Owens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 5×
• SAIF Corp. v. Banderas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 3×
• Okon v. Broadspire
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-03-25· cited 1×
• Suhor Industries, Inc. v. Pickett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-08
• Gage v. Fred Meyer Stores - Kroger Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-06

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Koitzsch v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-01-05· cited 14×
• Khrul v. Foremans Cleaners
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-07-08· cited 7×