Kharas v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the policy defined damages, it was not unambiguous that the 11 policy did not cover other claims
• mere delay in disclaiming coverage is insufficient to invoke estoppel when the insured has an “adequate opportunity to defend,” including by negotiating settlement
• delay insufficient to invoke estoppel when insured has adequate opportunity to negotiate settlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).