Khaled Sabbagh v. Hamilton Psychological Services Plc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing de novo claim that evidence was admitted in violation of Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
• “Mere words or gestures, however offensive, do not constitute legally sufficient provocation for a finding of voluntary manslaughter.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).