Kerr v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adoption of amendment which materially changes statute’s terminology raises presumption that departure from original law was intended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cooper v. Moore
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-12· cited 16×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 12×
• State v. Brannon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
• State v. Leopard
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-15· cited 9×
• Duckson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-09-08· cited 8×
• Cannon v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole & Pardon Services
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-29· cited 6×
• State v. Bull
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-22· cited 3×
• Cricket Store 17 v. City of Columbia
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Al-Shabazz v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-14· cited 168×
• Hawkins v. Freeman
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-11-09· cited 144×
• State v. Blackmon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-22· cited 78×
• North River Insurance v. Gibson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-07-02· cited 37×
• State v. De La Cruz
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-06-18· cited 13×
• Hawkins v. Freeman
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-03-26· cited 6×
• State v. Kerr
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 2×
• Temporary Services, Inc. v. American International Group, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-07-19· cited 1×