Skip to main content
· 2/26/2015

State of Florida v. Zachariah Dorsett

Citations

  • 158 So. 3d 557
  • 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 103
  • 2015 Fla. LEXIS 369
  • 2015 WL 790472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court- should look primarily at a statute’s plain meaning to determine legislative intent and that a court should only apply rules of statutory construction to determine legislative intent where the plain language of the statute is unclear or ambiguous
  • stating that a court should look primarily at a statute's plain meaning to determine legislative intent and that a court should only apply rules of statutory - 16 - construction to determine legislative intent where the plain language of the statute is unclear or ambiguous
  • “The interpretation of a statute is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to the de novo standard of review.”
  • “The interpretation of a statute is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to the de novo standard of review.”
  • “If jury instructions, viewed as a whole, fairly state the applicable law to the jury, the failure to give particular instructions will not be error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.