Skip to main content
· 7/26/1978

Keown v. Storti

Citations

  • 456 F. Supp. 232
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Lindy I and Lindy II authorize consideration of “the contingent nature of success, which may be used to increase the award, and the quality of the attorney’s work, which may be used to increase or decrease the award”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luongo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.