Kenneth J. McPhail v. R. James Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s assertions of clear and unmistakable error were no longer at issue and that the issue of equitable tolling of the period for filing a Notice of Disagreement based on mental incapacity was not properly before the Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dingess - Hartman v. Nicholson
  Veterans Claims· 2006-03-03· cited 738×
• Michael T. Rudd v. R. James Nicholson
  Veterans Claims· 2006-08-18· cited 59×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs
  Supreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
• Fugo v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1993-11-16· cited 199×
• Rosler v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1991-05-17· cited 155×
• Bucklinger v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1993-08-24· cited 116×
• Ashley v. Derwinski
  Veterans Claims· 1992-04-21· cited 113×
• Larry D. Barrett, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
  Federal Circuit· 2004-04-05· cited 106×
• Johnston v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1997-01-29· cited 95×
• Eddy v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1996-04-03· cited 65×
• Arnold v. Air Midwest, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-11-15· cited 60×
• Mason v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1995-06-26· cited 47×
• Phillips v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1997-01-13· cited 43×
• Watai v. Brown
  Veterans Claims· 1996-10-10· cited 13×