Kennedy v. Hudnall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court lacked appellate jurisdiction to review “turnover” order that required sheriff to seize and sell property purportedly conveyed by judgment debtor to third party; under turnover statute, court had authority only to (1
• concluding \turnover order\ was a misnomer and that the order failed to serve as a mandatory injunction
• declining to view an order as a mandatory injunction because it did not require the judgment debtor or transferee to take any affirmative action
• order directing sheriff to take “affirmative action” to “seize and sell the property,” but not ordering “anything collected or turned over” by judgment debtor, not mandatory injunction and, therefore, “not a turnover order”
• appeal may be taken from turnover order acting as mandatory injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).