Skip to main content
· 6/1/1995

Kendrick v. Fox Television

Citations

  • 659 A.2d 814
  • 24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1065
  • 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 109
  • 1995 WL 329947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it would invade executive function if courts were to decide whether statements of police officials about ongoing investigations were false and defamatory
  • “The public interest requires that police officials be free to comment about ongoing police activity on matters of public concern.”
  • the fact that plaintiff only claimed injury to reputation “cut[s] in favor of absolute immunity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wagner, Ferren, Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.