Vereen v. Clayborne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that recovery under contract implied-in-fact requires proof of “valuable services being rendered”
• reiterating above, but listing elements of breach of implied-in-fact contract that (a) do not seem to require that true contract can be inferred and (b
• reiterating above, but listing elements of breach of implied-in-fact contract that (a) do not seem to require that true contract can be inferred and (b
• \This particular quantum meruit analysis is more commonly known as a theory of unjust enrichment.\
• implied-in-fact contract is “inferred from the conduct of the parties in the milieu in which they dealt” (quoting Bloomgarden v. Coyer, 479 F.2d 201, 208 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
• applying a negligence standard to non-media defamation of private person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).