Skip to main content

Kelly v. State

Citations

  • 436 Md. 406
  • 82 A.3d 205
  • 2013 WL 6761939
  • 2013 Md. LEXIS 920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that war-rantless tracking of defendant’s vehicle without a proper warrant violated the Fourth Amendment
  • finding Knotts sufficiently binding appellate precedent to authorize GPS tracking at the time officers installed the device on defendant’s vehicle
  • “The remedy for an unlawful search is the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of that search.... This remedy is known as the ‘exclusionary rule.’ ”
  • “before Jones, binding appellate precedent in Maryland, namely Knotts, authorized the GPS tracking of a vehicle on public roads”
  • “before Jones, binding appellate precedent in Maryland, namely Knotts, authorized the GPS tracking of a vehicle on public roads”
  • “before Jones, binding appellate precedent in Maryland, namely Knotts, authorized the GPS tracking of a vehicle on public roads”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.