Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/23/2013
Kelly v. State
Citations
- 436 Md. 406
- 82 A.3d 205
- 2013 WL 6761939
- 2013 Md. LEXIS 920
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that war-rantless tracking of defendant’s vehicle without a proper warrant violated the Fourth Amendment
- finding Knotts sufficiently binding appellate precedent to authorize GPS tracking at the time officers installed the device on defendant’s vehicle
- “The remedy for an unlawful search is the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of that search.... This remedy is known as the ‘exclusionary rule.’ ”
- “before Jones, binding appellate precedent in Maryland, namely Knotts, authorized the GPS tracking of a vehicle on public roads”
- “before Jones, binding appellate precedent in Maryland, namely Knotts, authorized the GPS tracking of a vehicle on public roads”
- “before Jones, binding appellate precedent in Maryland, namely Knotts, authorized the GPS tracking of a vehicle on public roads”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbera
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court· 2016-11-03· cited 101×
- United States v. Henry StephensFourth Circuit· 2014-08-19· cited 56×
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-12· cited 35×
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-04-21· cited 27×
- State v. Johnson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-13· cited 26×
- Victor Keeylen v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-08-08· cited 15×
- Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-27· cited 11×
- Whittington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-06-02· cited 10×
- Whittington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-01· cited 3×
- State of Arizona v. Emilio JeanArizona Supreme Court· 2018-01-03
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court· 2012-01-23· cited 1,330×
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,170×
- Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court· 1995-03-01· cited 885×
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court· 1983-03-02· cited 749×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-01-31· cited 57×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-12· cited 29×
- State v. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-14· cited 29×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-13· cited 29×
- Briscoe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-24· cited 20×
- United States v. OrtizE.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-07-20· cited 15×
- United States v. Matthew MartinSeventh Circuit· 2013-03-25· cited 12×
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.