Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/21/2014

State v. Mitchell

Citations

234 Ariz. 410
323 P.3d 69
685 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
2014 WL 1576610
2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding the defendant has standing to challenge search of a vehicle if he has lawful possession of it
finding lawful possession “sufficient to confer standing under Jones” when defendant driver “had the rights of a bailee”
good-faith exception provides “meaningful deterrence because . . . it incentivizes law enforcement to err on the side of constitutional behavior”
good-faith exception provides “meaningful deterrence because ... it incentivizes law enforcement to err on the side of constitutional behavior”
\the exclusionary rule ... incentivizes law enforcement to err on the side of constitutional behavior.\
“[D]ecisions of the Ninth Circuit, although persuasive, are not binding on Arizona courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kessler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.