Kell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he mere fact that the appellant was present in a high crime area, which happened to be where he lived, at nighttime, without more, such as suspicious conduct or unusual circumstances . . . does not warrant an investigatory stop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burgess v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-19· cited 7×
• Woodson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-16· cited 6×
• In the Interest of J.L.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-15· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• State v. Pye
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-25· cited 40×
• State v. Hoover
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-02· cited 29×
• Ruddack v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-01· cited 20×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-09· cited 10×