Skip to main content

Kell v. State

Citations

  • 285 P.3d 1133
  • 2012 UT 25
  • 707 Utah Adv. Rep. 29
  • 2012 Utah LEXIS 45
  • 2012 WL 1564351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a motion under Utah’s Rule 60(b) cannot be used “as a substitute for a prohibited postconviction petition” or to “circumvent conflicting statutory mandates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Authored, Durham, Durrant, Lee, Nehring, Parrish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kell v. State

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.