Kelen v. Nordstrom, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that complaint “does not claim that 27 [plant changed her behavior in any way based on [defendant s| allegedly insufficient isclosures”
• stating that the complaint \does not claim that [plaintiff] changed her behavior in any way based on [defendant's] allegedly insufficient disclosures\
• determining that “conclusory claims of harm do not suffice” to plead a concrete injury in fact for standing purposes
• stating that the complaint “does not claim that [plaintiff] changed her behavior in any way based on [defendant’s] allegedly insufficient disclosures”
• “[A] plaintiff cannot demonstrate that she has 7 suffered a concrete injury by alleging a statutory violation alone.”
• “The [complaint] does not claim that 8 [plaintiff] changed her behavior in any way based on [defendant’s] allegedly insufficient 9 disclosures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).