Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/29/1989
Keith v. State
Citations
- 782 S.W.2d 861
- 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212
- 1989 WL 142735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a double jeopardy issue was not ripe for review because there was no initiation of any subsequent prosecution
- “[W]here the State intends to claim an error by the Court of Appeals’ rejection of an argument, that claim should be presented to this Court in a petition for discretionary review or a cross-petition for discretionary review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Clinton, Miller, Teague, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-16· cited 1,789×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-27· cited 154×
- Ex Parte GrangerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-02-10· cited 140×
- Cornealius v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-05-24· cited 125×
- Buxton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-07-26· cited 72×
- Haughton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-03-06· cited 61×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 30×
- Blasdell, Brandon ScottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-09-16· cited 24×
- In re E.U.M.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-04-24· cited 17×
- Bullard v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1994-12-28· cited 15×
- Land v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1994-12-30· cited 14×
- Townsend v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-10· cited 13×
- In Re EUMTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-04-24
- Brandy Deevon Tucker v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-06-28
- Nathan Felder v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-07-25
- in the Matter of E.U.M.Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2003-04-24
- Ex Parte Jesse Dale FoxTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-22
- Payne, Jason ThadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-02-27
- Willie Brooks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-08-08
- Jason Thad Payne v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2013-02-27
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,268×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 225×
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-20· cited 206×
- Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-15· cited 109×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-06-26· cited 72×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-07· cited 52×
- January v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-05-30· cited 35×
- January v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-02-04· cited 19×
- Keith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-23· cited 16×
- Keith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-05-07· cited 11×
- Ex Parte KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.