Keith v. Keith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To the extent that Retherford holds that adoption of tendered findings is automatically grounds for reversal, this holding conflicts with directly controlling precedent from our Supreme Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Kent Kaddatz v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2023-11-02
• S.S. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of Kentucky
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-04-11

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cherry v. Cherry
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1982-06-15· cited 120×
• Downing v. Downing
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2001-04-06· cited 64×
• B.C. v. B.T.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2005-12-29· cited 62×
• Keifer v. Keifer
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 48×
• Prater v. Cabinet for Human Resources
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1997-10-02· cited 43×
• Poe v. Poe
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1986-03-28· cited 41×
• Coffman v. Rankin
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2008-06-19· cited 38×
• Davis v. Davis
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1989-09-28· cited 37×
• Van Meter v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2000-02-18· cited 35×
• Bingham v. Bingham
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1982-03-09· cited 30×
• Eviston v. Eviston
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1974-03-15· cited 25×
• Krug v. Krug
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 20×
• Adams-Smyrichinsky v. Smyrichinsky
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2015-08-20· cited 19×
• Lawson v. Lawson
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2007-06-22· cited 11×
• Retherford v. Monday
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2016-09-02· cited 4×
• McIntosh v. Landrum
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2012-08-24· cited 3×