Bingham v. Bingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a \spouse's demonstrated need must ... constitute the maximum permissible alimony award\
• explaining that the recipient spouse’s demonstrated needs “constitute the maximum permissible alimony award”
• “[T]he spouse’s demonstrated need must . . . constitute the 20220697-CA 6 2024 UT App 28 Smith v. Smith maximum permissible alimony award.”
• “[T]he spouse’s demonstrated need must . . . constitute the maximum permissible alimony award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).