Keith v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “force is to be given to both the controlling words ‘highest’ and ‘best’ ” when interpreting the phrase “highest and best bidder”
• \force is to be given to both the controlling words `highest' and `best'\ when interpreting the phrase \highest and best bidder\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hilliard v. George G. Fetter L. & H. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1907-11-12· cited 16×
• Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Calhoun
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-12-17· cited 16×
• Ramsey v. City of Shelbyville
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1904-12-02· cited 13×
• Woodall v. South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1910-02-01· cited 13×
• Monarch v. Owensboro City R. R.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1905-02-24· cited 9×
• Baskett v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1949-04-29· cited 8×
• Forest Guardians v. Wells
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-04-25· cited 7×
• Groover v. City of Irvine
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1927-12-16· cited 7×
• S. R. Schaff & Co. v. City of LaGrange
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1917-06-22· cited 3×
• Owensboro Grain Co. v. Owensboro Riverport Authority
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1991-09-26· cited 1×
• Bastin Telephone Co. v. Davidson
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1917-05-29

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Detroit Citizens' St. Ry. Co. v. City of Detroit
  Sixth Circuit· 1894-10-02· cited 21×