Skip to main content
· 2/24/1905

Monarch v. Owensboro City R. R.

Citations

  • 119 Ky. 939
  • 85 S.W. 193
  • 1905 Ky. LEXIS 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a defendant may be liable for aiding-and-abetting under CUTPA
  • finding that plaintiff failed to allege primary RICO violation, and therefore claim for aiding and abetting must fail
  • “[G]eneral choice-of-law provisions in contracts must explicitly include tort claims to prevent a plaintiff from bringing a cause of action under CUTPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.