Skip to main content

Kaya v. Partington

Citations

  • 681 A.2d 256
  • 1996 R.I. LEXIS 211
  • 1996 WL 437115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an officer's IOD benefits were the exclusive remedy for work related injury allegedly caused by employer's negligence in preventing such an injury
  • stating that \[t]his Court will not construe a statute to reach an absurd result.\
  • “It is true that when adopted by the Legislature, the IOD statute contained no such exclusivity provision. However, as with the WCA, the remedy provided for in the IOD statute must be exclusive.”
  • \[t]his Court will not construe a statute to reach an absurd result\
  • \This court will not construe a statute to reach an absurd result.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger, Flanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.