Kawatra v. Kawatra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The responsibilities of a parent do not end when a child is asleep, at school or day care, or otherwise outside of the parent’s presence”
• split of 37.8%-62.2% did not allow the court “to conclude that the parties spent substantially equal intervals of time with the child”
• split of 37.8% ‒ 62.2% “percentages do not permit us to conclude that the parties spent substantially equal intervals of time with the child”
• split of 37.8%-62.2% did not allow the court “to conclude that the parties spent substantially equal intervals of time with the child”
• “Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-108 does not define what constitutes ‘actually spending substantially equal intervals of time.’”
• further noting that the court should consider whether either parent has interfered with the other parent’s time with the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).