Christopher Conrad Fichtel v. Jill Crowell Fichtel (Zirwas)
Syllabus
This appeal results from Father's petition in opposition to relocation. Trial on the petition was held over a period of more than a year. Ultimately, the trial court granted Father's petition in opposition and modified the parties' child support obligation to take into account their changed incomes. We vacate the trial court's determination of Father's income for child support purposes, but affirm the trial court's rulings in all other respects.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, even if the prosecutor’s statements in closing were improper, the court “cured the problem” by “instruct[ing] the jury that the lawyers’ statements were not evidence”
- noting that USCA11 Case: 21-13795 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 01/12/2023 Page: 11 of 13 21-13795 Opinion of the Court 11 Packingham was distinguishable and did not address whether such a condition violates the First Amendment
- “A district court does not commit plain error by imposing a com- puter restriction as a special condition of supervised release, even if the term of supervised release is life.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.