Skip to main content

Kaufman v. Pannuccio

Citations

  • 295 A.2d 639
  • 121 N.J. Super. 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where dual officeholder was given 30 days to elect either position
  • “ ‘If the duties of the two offices are such that when “placed in one person they might disserve the public interest, or if the respective offices might or will conflict even on rare occasions, it is sufficient to declare them legally incompatible.” [Citation.]’ ”
  • \ 'If the duties of the two offices are such that when \placed in one person they might disserve the public interest, or if the respective offices might or will conflict even on rare occasions, it is sufficient to declare them legally incompatible\ [Citation.]' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Labrecque, Kolovsky and Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kaufman v. Pannuccio

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.