Skip to main content
· 3/4/1980

Gryzik v. State

Citations

  • 380 So. 2d 1102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • echoing the incompatibility doctrine's application based on the duties under the \established governmental scheme.\
  • “Where quo warranto is an adequate remedy, it is the only proper remedy . . . .” (quoting State ex rel. Booth v. Byington, 168 So. 2d 164, 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.