Supreme Court· 3/29/1982
Karcher v. Daggett
Citations
- 456 U.S. 901
- 102 S. Ct. 1745
- 50 U.S.L.W. 3782
- 72 L. Ed. 2d 157
- 1982 U.S. LEXIS 1499
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the award of prejudgment interest in a case under federal law is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Joseph F. Purcell, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1993-08-05· cited 148×
- Home Savings Bank, F.S.B., by Its Conservator, the Resolution Trust Corporation v. Robert B. GillamNinth Circuit· 1991-12-31· cited 63×
- Kendall v. Sorani (In Re Richmond Produce Co.)N.D. California· 1996-04-09· cited 50×
- Amrein v. Wyoming Livestock BoardWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-04-28· cited 39×
- United States v. State of MichiganSixth Circuit· 1988-08-23· cited 30×
- United States v. GoodmanCourt of International Trade· 1983-09-13· cited 26×
- Smith v. StonerN.D. Indiana· 1984-09-26· cited 20×
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Tenth Circuit· 1988-08-22· cited 19×
- Daggett v. KimmelmanD. New Jersey· 1985-08-26· cited 18×
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesC.D. California· 1991-08-23· cited 17×
- Tucson Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-12-29· cited 12×
- Wright Runstad Properties Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-05-06· cited 12×
- In Re AcostaN.D. California· 1994-11-08· cited 9×
- In Re HowellNinth Circuit· 1984-04-19· cited 7×
- Murphy v. City of ElkoD. Nevada· 1997-10-06· cited 7×
- Smith v. Young (In Re Young)S.D. California· 1997-04-04· cited 7×
- Flanagan v. GillmorS.D. Ohio· 1982-05-25· cited 6×
- CALIFORNIA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 4×
- United States v. California State Board of EqualizationNinth Circuit· 1982-08-03· cited 3×
- United States v. State of Mich.W.D. Michigan· 1985-10-11· cited 3×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.