Skip to main content
· 7/31/1974

Karafa v. NJ State Lottery Comm.

Citations

  • 324 A.2d 97
  • 129 N.J. Super. 499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he principles of equitable fraud and promissory estoppel ... are unavailing in the face of [an] unequivocal legislative declaration”
  • by restricting payment of prizes to “holders of winning tickets,” legislature intended to exclude one who was a holder of a winning ticket or one who is entitled to be but is not presently a holder of a winning ticket
  • involving a \lost\ lottery ticket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kimmelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.