· 1/21/1994
Fowles v. Kansas State Lottery
Citations
- 867 P.2d 357
- 254 Kan. 557
- 1994 Kan. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding same in action against Kansas Lottery based on judicial review of agency action under KJRA
- affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and stating that the KJRA was the exclusive means to review the Kansas Lottery’s refusal to pay a claim on a lost winning ticket
- plaintiffs could not bring separate suit based on breach of contract where their sole remedy was through the KJRA
- to be a “holder” of a winning ticket and therefore entitled to the prize, plaintiff was required to have possession of a winning ticket
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abbott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.