Skip to main content
· 1/21/1994

Fowles v. Kansas State Lottery

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 357
  • 254 Kan. 557
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding same in action against Kansas Lottery based on judicial review of agency action under KJRA
  • affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and stating that the KJRA was the exclusive means to review the Kansas Lottery’s refusal to pay a claim on a lost winning ticket
  • plaintiffs could not bring separate suit based on breach of contract where their sole remedy was through the KJRA
  • to be a “holder” of a winning ticket and therefore entitled to the prize, plaintiff was required to have possession of a winning ticket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.