Fifth Circuit· 8/10/2004
Kapps v. Torch Offshore, Inc.
Citations
- 379 F.3d 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that cautionary statements must be taken into account in determining whether a reasonable investor would have been materially misled
- recognizing that cautionary statements must be taken into account in determining whether a reasonable investor would have been materially misled
- recognizing that cautionary statements must be taken into account in determining whether a reasonable investor would have been materially misled
- stating that “mere conclusory allegations will not suffice to prevent a motion to dismiss.”
- “A fact is material ‘if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider it important’ in making an investment decision.”
- “[T]he definition of ‘material’ … is not strictly limited to information that is firm-specific and non-public.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garwood, Jones, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2009-04-09· cited 1,176×
- Litwin v. Blackstone Group, L.P.Second Circuit· 2011-02-10· cited 220×
- Leonard Panella v. Tesco CorporationFifth Circuit· 2020-08-19· cited 129×
- Qualcomm v. American Wireless GroupMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-11-15· cited 30×
- Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. Ryder Scott Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2012-12-06· cited 24×
- In Re Dynegy, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. Texas· 2004-10-07· cited 21×
- Plymouth County Retirement Ass'n v. Primo Water Corp.M.D. North Carolina· 2013-08-14· cited 18×
- Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & \Erisa\ Litigation v. UBS PaineWebber, Inc.S.D. Texas· 2017-02-28· cited 17×
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Dynegy, Inc.S.D. Texas· 2005-01-03· cited 16×
- In Re Franklin Bank Corp. Securities LitigationS.D. Texas· 2011-03-21· cited 14×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Washington Investment NetworkD.C. Circuit· 2007-02-06· cited 14×
- In re Kosmos Energy Ltd. Securities LitigationN.D. Texas· 2013-06-24· cited 14×
- Ilia Kolominsky v. Root, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2024-04-29· cited 14×
- In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities LitigationD. New Mexico· 2011-06-02· cited 11×
- Mallen v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc.S.D. California· 2012-03-22· cited 8×
- Dawes v. Imperial Sugar Co.S.D. Texas· 2013-09-27· cited 7×
- Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd.N.D. California· 2006-10-27· cited 6×
- Nguyen v. Maxpoint Interactive, Inc.S.D. New York· 2017-02-13· cited 6×
- Izadjoo v. Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.S.D. Texas· 2017-02-14· cited 6×
- Ramirez ex rel. Situated v. Exxon Mobil Corp.N.D. Texas· 2018-08-14· cited 6×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 2,686×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.First Circuit· 1996-05-07· cited 855×
- Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2003-06-13· cited 527×
- Oxford Asset Mgmt. Ltd. v. Michael JaharisEleventh Circuit· 2002-07-16· cited 391×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1993-10-14· cited 375×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,451 Jerry Krim, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Banctexas Group, Inc., Banctexas Group, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1993-05-12· cited 318×
- In Re Worlds Of Wonder Securities LitigationNinth Circuit· 1994-09-15· cited 307×
- Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. KraftsowThird Circuit· 1989-11-29· cited 240×
- Nathenson v. Zonagen Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2001-10-15· cited 231×
- Wielgos v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Seventh Circuit· 1989-12-12· cited 148×
- Kane Enterprises v. MacGregor (USA) Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2003-02-27· cited 108×
- In Re Nationsmart Corporation Securities LitigationEighth Circuit· 1998-01-15· cited 106×
- Lucia v. Prospect Street High Income Portfolio, Inc.First Circuit· 1994-09-28· cited 88×
- United Paperworkers International Union, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Paper Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1993-02-12· cited 79×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,019 Mary Margaret Ward, Cross-Appellants v. Succession of Richard W. Freeman, Cross-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1988-09-15· cited 67×
- Zucker v. QuashaD. New Jersey· 1995-07-07· cited 47×
- Klein v. General Nutrition Companies, Inc.Third Circuit· 1999-12-07· cited 41×
Other cases named Kapps v. Torch Offshore, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.