Skip to main content

Kane v. Kane

Citations

  • 434 N.E.2d 1311
  • 13 Mass. App. Ct. 557
  • 1982 Mass. App. LEXIS 1321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to trial court for recalculation of attorneys fees where “[m]any of the conferences between counsel appear to have been unnecessary and led to some overall duplication of effort”
  • no error in master’s findings imputing income to husband in divorce proceedings where findings are “supported in part by careful consideration of available records and an analysis of several of the husband’s financial transactions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hale, Greaney, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.