Skip to main content

Bianco v. Bianco

Citations

  • 358 N.E.2d 243
  • 371 Mass. 420
  • 1976 Mass. LEXIS 1187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • confirming that under 1974 law, judges had broad discretion provided that they considered all statutory factors and made required findings of fact
  • explaining that statute gives court “power to dispose completely of the property of [divorcing] litigants” through equitable division
  • where judge has broad discretion, “it is important that a judge’s findings clearly indicate that [the judge] has weighed all” relevant considerations
  • in case of first impression, we interpreted G. L. c. 208, § 34, to define scope of judge’s discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Reardon, Braucher, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Bianco v. Bianco

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.