Ohio Supreme Court· 8/25/1993
Kamm v. Kamm
Citations
- 67 Ohio St. 3d 174
- 616 N.E.2d 900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that to support a deviation from child support guidelines, a court may consider the proximity in time of the acquisition of a capital asset to the date of termination of the child support obligation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Fifth, Hoffman, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Boutz v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-09-20· cited 21×
- Habtemariam v. WorkuOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-21· cited 13×
- Roubanes v. RoubanesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-30· cited 6×
- Lykins v. LykinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-11· cited 6×
- In re OrecchioOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-21· cited 4×
- Wyman v. WhitsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-05-04· cited 3×
- Jackowski v. JackowskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-17· cited 1×
- Lisa Norton v. Max NortonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-01-10
- Nina Alice Kimble v. Michael Wayne KimbleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-08-08
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Kamm v. Kamm
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.