Skip to main content
· 4/7/1986

Kamakawiwoole v. State

Citations

  • 718 P.2d 1105
  • 6 Haw. App. 235
  • 1986 Haw. App. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury must decide whether the State impliedly invited beach users to use the U.S. Army’s adjacent, de facto public park fronting the ocean, and therefore owed a duty to warn of known or knowable dangers
  • “[Operating a de facto public park partially fronting the public beach and ocean and surrounding the Army’s de facto public park fronting the public beach and ocean ...;” both de facto public parks were contiguous with the beach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.