Skip to main content
· 4/10/1987

Kaess v. Armstrong Cork Co.

Citations

  • 403 N.W.2d 643
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 2616
  • 1987 Minn. LEXIS 738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Hildebrandt considered whether the exception should be extended under the language quoted above from Breimhorst
  • \Through the years we have upheld the legislative mandate of the exclusive remedy provision by maintaining the narrowness of the intentional tort exception.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.