Skip to main content
· 8/17/2004

Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.

Citations

  • 684 N.W.2d 434
  • 2004 WL 1688183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the assault exception did not apply to a birthday spanking administered by co-workers “during working hours in the workplace because all employees were spanked on their birthdays and the spanking was not personally motivated.”
  • stating that \[w]e have narrowly construed the assault exception\ when rejecting an employee's argument that an injury claim was excluded from workers' compensation coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.