Skip to main content

Jupiter v. State

Citations

  • 833 So. 2d 169
  • 2002 WL 31528583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the decision of the trial court to assess victim-injury points for the third-degree murder conviction, but not for the false-imprisonment conviction, was a pure issue of law subject to de novo review
  • invoking en banc procedure to recede from decision that \failed to recognize the effect of the clear language of the applicable rule of criminal procedure\
  • invoking en banc procedure to recede from decision that “failed to recognize the effect of the clear language of the applicable rule of criminal procedure”
  • en banc decision released without antecedent publication of panel decision
  • en banc decision released without antecedent publication of panel decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.