District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/25/2006
Daniels v. State
Citations
- 929 So. 2d 710
- 2006 WL 1418661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here is no Apprendi violation [where], as the record indicates, the ... additional [scoresheet] points did not cause Appellant’s sentence ... to exceed the prescribed statutory maximum.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 853×
- Trapp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-01· cited 249×
- Trease v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-08-17· cited 127×
- Isaac v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-23· cited 50×
- Behl v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-16· cited 24×
- Jupiter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-15· cited 13×
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-21· cited 12×
- Dillard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-02-11· cited 11×
- Seagrave v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-16· cited 6×
- Borjas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.