Skip to main content

Daniels v. State

Citations

  • 929 So. 2d 710
  • 2006 WL 1418661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]here is no Apprendi violation [where], as the record indicates, the ... additional [scoresheet] points did not cause Appellant’s sentence ... to exceed the prescribed statutory maximum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.