· 12/30/1982
Julius Rothschild & Co. v. State
Citations
- 655 P.2d 877
- 66 Haw. 76
- 1982 Haw. LEXIS 256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- replacement of major bridge involved evaluation of broad policy factors and was thus within discretionary function exception
- replacement of major bridge involved evaluation of broad policy factors and was thus within discretionary function exception
- where court held that when state does not raise the discretionary function exception defense in its responsive pleadings, it may raise that defense by motion
- the State’s failure to install highway guardrail is protected by immunity
- the State's failure to install highway guardrail is protected by immunity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Nakamura, Marumoto, Place, Lum, Ogata, Menor, Temporarily
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.