Skip to main content
· 12/30/1982

Julius Rothschild & Co. v. State

Citations

  • 655 P.2d 877
  • 66 Haw. 76
  • 1982 Haw. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • replacement of major bridge involved evaluation of broad policy factors and was thus within discretionary function exception
  • replacement of major bridge involved evaluation of broad policy factors and was thus within discretionary function exception
  • where court held that when state does not raise the discretionary function exception defense in its responsive pleadings, it may raise that defense by motion
  • the State’s failure to install highway guardrail is protected by immunity
  • the State's failure to install highway guardrail is protected by immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Nakamura, Marumoto, Place, Lum, Ogata, Menor, Temporarily

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.