Breed Ex Rel. Breed v. Shaner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the State Tort Liability Act should be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose of compensation
• holding, the state liable for activities that were operational in nature and which did not involve “broad policy factors”
• holding, pursuant to Orso, that the rule in Sala-vea is limited only to the applicability of HRS § 662-4 to the City, and is “not authority to support a total extension of the [STLA] to the County”
• holding, pursuant to Orso, that the rule in Salavea is limited only to the applicability of HRS § 662-4 to the City, and is \not authority to support a total extension of the [STLA] to the County\
• noting as an example a decision not to construct a prison \require[s] evaluation of broad policy factors\
• highway design decisions involved did not require evaluation of broad policy factors and therefore did not come within discretionary function exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).