Hawaii Supreme Court· 4/1/1977

Breed Ex Rel. Breed v. Shaner

Citations

562 P.2d 436
57 Haw. 656
1977 Haw. LEXIS 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the State Tort Liability Act should be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose of compensation
holding, the state liable for activities that were operational in nature and which did not involve “broad policy factors”
holding, pursuant to Orso, that the rule in Sala-vea is limited only to the applicability of HRS § 662-4 to the City, and is “not authority to support a total extension of the [STLA] to the County”
holding, pursuant to Orso, that the rule in Salavea is limited only to the applicability of HRS § 662-4 to the City, and is \not authority to support a total extension of the [STLA] to the County\
noting as an example a decision not to construct a prison \require[s] evaluation of broad policy factors\
highway design decisions involved did not require evaluation of broad policy factors and therefore did not come within discretionary function exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Kobayashi, Ogata, Well, Kato, Place, Menor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.