Julian v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he obvious reason for the distinction between our burglary and breaking and entering statutes is the intent of the general assembly to punish burglary more severely because it involves entering a place where people, as opposed to mere property, are likely to be”
• burglary involves entering a place where people, as opposed to mere property, are likely to be

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Darrel Duane Grisel
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-06-05· cited 249×
• Tracy Shipman v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-06-05· cited 28×
• State v. Bennett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-25· cited 9×
• Horton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-04-23· cited 4×
• Rodney L. Baker v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-03-10· cited 4×
• United States v. Grisel
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-06-04
• United States v. Robinson
  E.D. Arkansas· 2016-10-20

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Barksdale v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-10-03· cited 20×