Fourth Circuit· 1/24/2003

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti

Citations

317 F.3d 401
2003 WL 164537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[t]he Court’s refusal to extend Bivens has been especially apparent in cases involving complex statutory schemes in which Congress has considered and created meaningful avenues for redress”
refusing to create a Bivens 2 remedy for violations of the Code because Congress had already crafted a “complex statutory scheme regulating the relationship between taxpayers and the IRS”
“Because of the strong policy animating the Anti-Injunction Act, and the sympathetic, almost unique, facts in Regan, Courts have construed the Regan exception very narrowly®”
“It would be difficult to conceive of a more comprehensive statutory scheme, or one that has received more intense scrutiny from Congress, than the Internal Revenue Code.”
explaining South Carolina v. Regan, 465 U.S. 367 (1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Luttig, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.