Skip to main content
· 1/24/2011

Gouby-Bachman v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

Citations

  • 764 F. Supp. 2d 684
  • 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1851
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a party had “abandoned the affirmative defenses it did not defend on summary judgment,” thus “entitling] [the opposing party] to summary judgment on those defenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.